Facebook’s $1,000 reward just applies to full-time staffer employed from home , not contractual workers


President Mark Zuckerberg said in an inner reminder not long ago that the organization will give representatives telecommuting during the COVID-19 pandemic a $1,000 money reward. In any case, as the Intercept previously announced, temporary workers won’t get the reward.

When TechCrunch asked Facebook for what good reason temporary workers won’t get the reward, an organization representative sent us an announcement like the one it gave the Intercept, saying that “The $1,000 is for full-time employees who are working from home. For contract workers, we are sending them home and paying them in full even if they are unable to work, which is much more meaningful than a one off payment.”

The BBC detailed before today that Zuckerberg said in a call with columnists that provisional laborers will likewise get their full pay rates regardless of whether they can’t finish all their typical undertakings. In any case, Joe Rivano Barros of the Worker Agency, which directions battles for backing bunches like Gig Workers Rise and RAICES Texas, told the production, “it’s great that they are letting them work from home, but it seems like the bare minimum Facebook could do.”

Facebook has an expected 15,000 substance mediators, working through outsider temporary workers. In the call secured by the BBC, Zuckerberg said that Facebook full-time workers will assume control over choices about delicate subjects, including self-mischief and suicide, to some degree to diminish the psychological well-being effect of review such substance on contractual workers, and included he was “personally quite worried that the isolation from people being at home could potentially lead to more depression or mental health issues, and I want to make sure that we are ahead of that supporting our community.”

A part of Facebook’s substance control is additionally performed by calculations, however the weaknesses of its channels was featured for this present week when a bug blocked sharing of coronavirus-related substance on the stage, even from genuine new sources (posts were later reestablished). Human specialists are as yet fundamental to Facebook’s substance balance framework.

The effect of screening content, including fierce or upsetting material, on human arbitrators was brought to consideration a year ago after a significant report from The Verge in February 2019 about the emotional well-being cost experienced by numerous contractual workers. A short time later, Zuckerberg said the organization would focus on paying all Facebook contractual workers in the U.S. “a wage that’s more reflective of the local costs of living. And for those who review content on our site to make sure it follows our community standards, we’re going even further. We’re going to provide them a higher base wage, additional benefits, and more supportive programs given the nature of their jobs.”

As a component of its COVID-19 reaction, Facebook likewise said that it will pay unexpected laborers who can’t fill in as workplaces close since individuals have been requested to telecommute, following comparative measures from Microsoft and different organizations.

Yet, as TechCrunch’s Jonathan Shieber and Alex Wilhelm noted, numerous tech organizations have made a “dual-class worker system in recent years, keeping their more technical and product-oriented staff as full-time workers for the main company, while exporting elements of labor to third-party companies… Moving to comp more, or all workers, is not only good PR, though it is also that, it’s simply good ethics.”

Leave a Reply